Angie · learn

Exit FCF multiple

The multiple applied to terminal-year free cash flow when the exit-multiple method is used instead of Gordon growth.

Updated 2026-09-03

An exit multiple sets the terminal value by assuming the business is worth some fixed multiple of its final projected year, rather than assuming it grows forever. It is the alternative to Gordon growth, and Angie uses it for cyclicals.

The reasoning is that a cyclical company's final projected year is a point on a cycle, not a run-rate. Assuming perpetual growth from whatever the oil price happened to be doing in year five is a category error. A multiple says something more modest and more honest: at the end of the projection, this is a business somebody would pay a normal price for.

Worked example
Energy8×
Basic materials10×
Consumer cyclical14×
Industrials15×
Consumer defensive, real estate services16×
Healthcare, communication services18×
Financial services (networks, exchanges)20×
Technology22×

Angie's exit multiples by sector. Lower for the more cyclical industries, because a good year there is less likely to represent the future.

The multiple is a judgement, and it is the assumption a sceptical reader should push on first when Angie values a cyclical. It is applied structurally by sector rather than per company, so it does not go stale each earnings season, but it also cannot know that this particular producer is unusual.

See also

  • Terminal method — How value beyond the horizon is set: Gordon growth, which assumes cash flow grows forever at a fixed rate, or a multiple applied to the final year.
  • Terminal value — Everything the business is worth beyond the projection horizon, set by Gordon growth or an exit multiple and then discounted back. It is usually the majority of the answer.

← See this one in the deck

Educational content, not investment advice. Angie explains how a valuation is built so you can judge it yourself. What you do with that is your call.

IsiofiaIsiofia